| re: Should we just assume leads won’t be present? |
| Posted by: portenopete 11:52 am EDT 05/03/24 |
| In reply to: re: Should we just assume leads won’t be present? - Singapore/Fling 05:23 pm EDT 05/02/24 |
|
Oh, that's low SF! Using Julie Andrews like that! LOL
I wonder how many MFL's she did when she wasn't feeling 100%? From what I know, she did miss quite a few since Eliza is a b***h of a sing. But I can imagine that once she was a "thing" and sensing that she's an all-around good egg she probably sucked it up and performed when it would've been wiser to rest up. I bet she started doing damage to those cords forty years before V/V finally did her in. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Should we just assume leads won’t be present? - Singapore/Fling 05:23 pm EDT 05/02/24 |
| Next: |
re: Should we just assume leads won’t be present? - ryhog 06:54 pm EDT 05/03/24 |
| Thread: |
|
